🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.