🔗 Share this article

Across several weeks, threatening communications persisted. At first, reportedly from an ex-law enforcement official and an ex-military commander, and then from the authorities. In the end, a local artisan claims he was ordered to the police station and warned explicitly: keep quiet or encounter real trouble.

Shaikh is part of a group opposing a high-value redevelopment plan where this historic settlement – a massive informal community with rich history – is scheduled to be bulldozed and transformed by a large business group.

"The distinctive community of Dharavi is exceptional in the world," states the protester. "Yet the plan aims to eradicate our social fabric and prevent our protests."

Opposing Environments

The narrow alleys of Dharavi stand in sharp opposition to the high-rise structures and Bollywood penthouses that loom over the neighborhood. Homes are built haphazardly and often lacking adequate facilities, small-scale operations release harmful emissions and the air is filled with the overpowering odor of open sewers.

To some, the prospect of Dharavi transformed into a developed area of high-end towers, organized recreational areas, contemporary malls and residences with two toilets is a hopeful vision realized.

"We lack proper healthcare, roads or sewage systems and there are no spaces for youth to recreate," states a chai seller, 56, who moved from Tamil Nadu in the early eighties. "The only way is to clear the area and provide modern residences."

Resident Opposition

But others, including Shaikh, are fighting against the redevelopment.

All recognize that the slum, historically ignored as an illegal encroachment, is urgently needing investment and development. However they worry that this project – without community input – might transform valuable urban land into a luxury development, forcing out the lower-caste, working-class residents who have lived there since the late 1800s.

These were these marginalized, displaced people who established the empty marshland into a frequently examined example of self-reliance and economic productivity, whose production is estimated at between a significant amount and two million dollars per year, making it one of the world's largest unregulated sectors.

Displacement Concerns

Among approximately 1 million people living in the crowded sprawling zone, fewer than half will be qualified for alternative accommodation in the project, which is expected to take a significant period to complete. The remainder will be relocated to wastelands and coastal regions on the remote edges of the city, threatening to fragment a generations-old social network. Certain individuals will receive no housing at all.

Those allowed to stay in the area will be allocated units in multi-story structures, a major break from the natural, shared lifestyle of residing and operating that has supported Dharavi for many years.

Industries from clothing production to pottery and recycling are projected to reduce in scale and be transferred to a specific "industrial sector" distant from people's residences.

Survival Challenge

For residents like this protester, a leather artisan and long-time inhabitant to live in the slum, the plan presents a fundamental risk. His makeshift, three-floor facility produces leather coats – formal jackets, suede trenches, fashionable garments – distributed in premium stores in upscale neighborhoods and internationally.

His family resides in the spaces downstairs and his workers and tailors – migrants from north India – live there, allowing him to afford their labour. Beyond the slum, accommodation prices are typically significantly costlier for basic accommodation.

Harassment and Intimidation

Within the official facilities in the vicinity, a conceptual model of the transformation initiative shows a very different perspective. Slickly dressed residents move around on two-wheelers and electric vehicles, acquiring continental baked goods and croissants and having coffee on a terrace adjacent to a coffee shop and dessert parlor. This depicts a complete departure from the affordable idli sambar first meal and low-cost tea that supports local residents.

"This isn't progress for us," says the protester. "This constitutes a massive real estate deal that will render it impossible for us to survive."

Additionally, there exists concern of the development company. Run by a powerful tycoon – a leading figure and a close ally of the national leader – the conglomerate has encountered allegations of preferential treatment and questionable practices, which it denies.

Even as administrative bodies calls it a collaborative effort, the developer paid $950m for its 80% stake. Legal proceedings claiming that the initiative was improperly granted to the business group is being considered in the nation's highest judicial body.

Continued Intimidation

Since they began to vocally oppose the redevelopment, protesters and community members assert they have been faced a long-running campaign of coercion and warning – comprising messages, direct threats and insinuations that opposing the development was comparable with opposing national interests – by individuals they claim represent the corporate group.

Part of the group suspected of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c