🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable little “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a large but guardian-like companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “endless energy” and moves like a worm. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been entangled in a tussle between a defunct facility, local and national governments and welfare campaigners.

But those closest to the whales say the impassioned controversy over their future often fails to consider the complexities of the whales who, after living their entire lives in enclosed habitats, have been closely studied by the humans who interact with them daily.

After the Canadian government blocked the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling facility near Niagara Falls where they are kept warned to euthanize them unless the federal government covers the cost of their care. The nation’s fisheries minister has rejected that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Scientists say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and group interactions suggest they are remarkably smart creatures – something one caretaker observed first-hand.

She spent a significant period as a whale caretaker, a role that entailed gaining confidence of the marine predators.

“Building up those relationships over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”

Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nonetheless amazed by the subtleties and unique traits in their characters. She cultivated a deep bond for two female belugas with opposing personalities.

“Eve chose me. The other required effort,” she said. “They changed the way I perceive relationships.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Burgess’s connection with the whales progressed against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their captivity.

During her tenure at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, died. In all, nineteen belugas have died at the park since 2019, a statistic which the facility links to expected lifespan, but which activists say reflects the inadequate care in which they were housed.

The park did not operate to the guests over the recent season, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes results of the cessation. “Concrete is deteriorating from the tanks because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and move about with fragments in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not respond to a questionnaire, but earlier claimed: “The whales … obtain far better health care and around the clock supervision than any individual in the Britain, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was fired from the park in the spring following the death of Eos, an ailing beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the park thought information of the death were disclosed to the press and she was released shortly thereafter.

The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left her and staff members in distress. She says the facility’s ultimatum to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” undertaking, adding any plans to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “significant manpower”, vehicles and heavy equipment.

“It’s impossible in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for calls for the whales to be taken immediately from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.

In recent months, the nation’s government official turned down a request to export the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the proposal would have meant a perpetual situation in captivity and a reversion to performance for audiences,” the minister stated. “As society, we know that belugas are meant for the ocean, not in tanks for our entertainment. I could not in clear conscience authorize an relocation that would continue the conditions these belugas have experienced.”

But Burgess said the official’s remarks reveal a broader misunderstanding of the facts of life for belugas raised in confinement.

“The people needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in enclosed habitats and they will need ongoing assistance for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As authorities attempt to find a solution, ideas have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. One proposal called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A planned sanctuary in the region of Nova Scotia, which has received government approval, has been most controversial. The prospective location, which includes 100 acres of enclosed sea water, doesn’t yet exist. Proponents remain hopeful that it could eventually represent a sustainable answer for a number of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Others say the prospect of a protected habitat indicates a worldwide trend away from captive facilities and could represent a viable plan in the short term.

Charles Vinick, director of the sanctuary project, said the location will replicate the cognitive activities and nutrition the whales get from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger space. He said after the medical condition of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|